Ayers v. City of Chicago

56 N.E. 1133, 185 Ill. 253

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In these cases judgments were entered confirming special assessments to pay for grading, paving and curbing certain streets in the city of Chicago. In each case the ordinance providing for the improvement is subject to the same objection as the ordinance passed upon in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207. Upon the authority of that case and Hurlbut v. City of Chicago, 184 Ill. 455, the judgments herein are reversed and the causes remanded.

„ 7 7 7 , Reversed and remanded.