Ayers v. City of Chicago
This text of 56 N.E. 1133 (Ayers v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these cases judgments were entered confirming special assessments to pay for grading, paving and curbing certain streets in the city of Chicago. In each case the ordinance providing for the improvement is subject to the same objection as the ordinance passed upon in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207. Upon the authority of that case and Hurlbut v. City of Chicago, 184 Ill. 455, the judgments herein are reversed and the causes remanded.
„ 7 7 7 , Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.E. 1133, 185 Ill. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayers-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1900.