Hurlburd v. Bogardus
10 Cal. 518
Opinion
Baldwin, J., concurring.
In this case, there was no such actual and continued change in the possession of the property, under plaintiffs’ purchase, as to take the case out of the operation of the Statute of Frauds. It remained in charge of the same person, at the same place, and was used in the same manner after as before such purchase.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurlburd v. Bogardus, 10 Cal. 518 (Cal. 1858).
10 Cal. 518 (Hurlburd v. Bogardus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raddatz v. Hedgpeth
223 Cal. App. 2d 633 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Brown v. Federal Surety Co.
8 P.2d 647 (Montana Supreme Court, 1932)
Heinlen v. Beans
12 P. 167 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
Abrahams v. Jones
20 Ill. App. 83 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
Gray v. Sullivan
10 Nev. 416 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1876)