Huntsman v. Southwest Airlines Co.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 JAYSON HUNTSMAN, Case No. 19-cv-00083-PJH 8 Plaintiff,
9 v. ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 10 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Re: Dkt. No. 99 11 Defendant. 12
13 14 Before the court is defendant Southwest Airlines Co.’s renewed administrative 15 motion to seal portions of its opposition to plaintiff’s motion for class certification and 16 exhibits in support of the opposition. Dkt. 99. 17 A party seeking to seal materials submitted with a motion that is “more than 18 tangentially related to the merits of the case”—regardless whether that motion is 19 “technically dispositive”—must demonstrate that there are compelling reasons to keep 20 the documents under seal. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 21 1101-02 (9th Cir. 2016). Class certification motions are more than tangentially related to 22 the merits of the case. See A.B. v. Pac. Fertility Ctr., 441 F.Supp.3d 902, 906 (N.D. Cal. 23 2020); Racies v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC, 2017 WL 6405612, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 24 2017). 25 The materials at issue here do not all meet the compelling interest standard to 26 warrant sealing. 27 Opposition brief: The court GRANTS the request to file the redacted opposition 1 Declaration of Brian D. Berry, Exhibit A: The court DENIES the request to seal the 2 deposition transcript at Hunstman Dep. 208:2-25 and court GRANTS the request to seal 3 the deposition transcript at Huntsman Dep. 302:15-303:25. 4 Declaration of Brian D. Berry, Exhibit B: The court GRANTS the request to seal 5 plaintiff’s W-2 tax forms (P00003-08) and DENIES the request to seal plaintiff’s “PCARS” 6 military service record (P00009-15). The court DENIES the request to seal plaintiff’s 7 Reserve Order from the Air Force (P000016-17), except that the parties may redact 8 plaintiff’s retired pay grade following the equal sign (=) on P000016 because it may 9 implicate financial information. 10 Declaration of John Freed, Exhibit 1: The court DENIES the request to seal the 11 document listing plaintiff’s “Active Duty Statuses” in 2017 and 2018 (SWA-HUNTSII 12 009251). 13 Declaration of John Freed, Exhibit 2: The court DENIES the request to seal the 14 calendar with military service date information for Plaintiff in 2017 and 2018 (SWA- 15 HUNTSII 009252). 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: February 24, 2021 19 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 20 United States District Judge
22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huntsman v. Southwest Airlines Co. (Huntsman v. Southwest Airlines Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.