Huntley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Huntley v. State

267 S.W.3d 811, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2008 WL 4709741

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 28, 2008

DocketED 90663

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 S.W.3d 811 (Huntley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huntley v. State, 267 S.W.3d 811, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2008 WL 4709741 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Huntley (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 1 amended motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

1

. Unless otherwise stated, all rule references are to Missouri Court Rules (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI