Deal v. Deal

267 S.W.3d 811, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580, 2008 WL 4709847
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. ED 90616·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Allen Deal (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Marianna Rowe Deal (‘Wife”). Husband argues the trial court erred in awarding Husband maintenance in the amount of $2,546.00 per month, in ordering Husband to pay $595.81 per *812 month in child support, and in failing to award Husband attorney’s fees.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deal v. Deal, 267 S.W.3d 811, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580, 2008 WL 4709847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

267 S.W.3d 811 (Deal v. Deal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huntley v. State
267 S.W.3d 811 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)