Huntington National Bank v. Kosydar
401 U.S. 1005, 91 S. Ct. 1260, 28 L. Ed. 2d 542, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2478
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 5, 1971
DocketNo. 1330
StatusPublished
Cited by65 cases
This text of 401 U.S. 1005 (Huntington National Bank v. Kosydar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Huntington National Bank v. Kosydar, 401 U.S. 1005, 91 S. Ct. 1260, 28 L. Ed. 2d 542, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2478 (1971).
Opinion
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ohio dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Young v. Red Clay Consolidated School District
159 A.3d 713 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2017)
Veasey v. Perry
71 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D. Texas, 2014)
Bahr v. State
985 P.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1999)
Ripplinger v. Collins
868 F.2d 1043 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
State v. Wiman
769 P.2d 1200 (Montana Supreme Court, 1989)
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc.
729 P.2d 898 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)
Erickson-Shaver Contracting Corp. v. United States
33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,191 (Court of Claims, 1985)
P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United States
732 F.2d 913 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
The United States of America v. James Dean Barton
731 F.2d 669 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State of Arizona
559 F. Supp. 1237 (D. Arizona, 1983)
Madalyn Murray O'Hair and Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Mark White
675 F.2d 680 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Manuel Lee Runnels, Cross-Appellant v. Norman Hess, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, Cross-Appellees
653 F.2d 1359 (Tenth Circuit, 1981)
Arizona v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad
656 F.2d 398 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
State Of Arizona v. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railroad Company
656 F.2d 398 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
State v. Glass
583 P.2d 872 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1978)
Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant And
569 F.2d 459 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Alan Lloyd Lussier v. Frank O. Gunter
552 F.2d 385 (First Circuit, 1977)
United States v. State of Texas
422 F. Supp. 917 (S.D. Texas, 1976)
Hammons v. Scott
423 F. Supp. 618 (N.D. California, 1976)
United States v. Bobbie L. Bishop
534 F.2d 214 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
401 U.S. 1005, 91 S. Ct. 1260, 28 L. Ed. 2d 542, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huntington-national-bank-v-kosydar-scotus-1971.