Hunter v. State

779 So. 2d 492, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16565, 2000 WL 1745141
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 2000·No. No. 2D00-3754·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to counsel’s untimely filing of the notice of appeal. See Demaria v. State, 778 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, we certify to the Supreme Court of Florida the same question that this court certified in Diaz v. State, 724 So.2d 595, 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), with the following modifications:

DOES THE HOLDING IN LAMBRIX V STATE, 698 SO. 2D 247 (FLA.1996), WHEN CONSIDERED IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA’S PRONOUNCEMENT IN STEELE V. KEHOE, 747 SO. 2D 931 (FLA.1999), FORECLOSE THE PROVISION OF A BELATED APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF A POST-CONVICTION MOTION WHEN THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS NOT TIMELY FILED DUE TO THE INEFFECTIVENESS OF COUNSEL IN THE COLLATERAL PROCEEDING?

Appeal dismissed; question certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FULMER and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. State, 779 So. 2d 492, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16565, 2000 WL 1745141 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

779 So. 2d 492 (Hunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crews v. State
779 So. 2d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)