Hunter v. Sheriff St. Market & Stor. Co.

155 N.E. 404, 23 Ohio App. 363, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 386, 1926 Ohio App. LEXIS 484
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 10, 1926
Docket6519
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 N.E. 404 (Hunter v. Sheriff St. Market & Stor. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter v. Sheriff St. Market & Stor. Co., 155 N.E. 404, 23 Ohio App. 363, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 386, 1926 Ohio App. LEXIS 484 (Ohio Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

Mrs. Adam Hunter, while standing in an aisle of the building owned and opearted by the Sheriff St. Market Co., was injured by a truck being pushed along said aisle by an employee of a tenant in said building. It appears from the evidence that the company had complete control of all aisles in said building; that the operator of said truck attempted to stop it, but owing to the slippery condition of the floor said truck slid along same until it struck Hunter.

After all evidence was presented by Hunter, the company moved for a directed verdict, and said motion being granted, Hunter prosecuted error. The Court of Appeals held:

1. The general rule regulating the rights of the parities in this case is laid down in 112 OS. 122 which decides that if owner retains control of halls, etc., it is his duty to exercise ordinary care to keep same in a reasonably safe condition.

2. The aisle in which the collision occurred was under the control of the Company.

3. It was for a jury to determine whether or not such aisle was kept in safe condition by the company, and if not whether or not the condition was the proximate cause of the injury.

4. The court below erred in directing verdict.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for new trial.

Judges Richards, Williams and Young of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toth Provision Co. v. Bagnull
3 N.E.2d 645 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 N.E. 404, 23 Ohio App. 363, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 386, 1926 Ohio App. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-sheriff-st-market-stor-co-ohioctapp-1926.