Hunter v. District of Columbia Government
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ERNEST HUNTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1491 (ABJ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation [Dkt. # 71] as well as plaintiff’s objections [Dkt. # 72], and for the reasons
stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 51] is DENIED;
3. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 66] is
GRANTED as to the remaining portions of Counts I and II; and
4. Counts IV and V are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff Ernest Hunter may re-file his state law claims in the Superior Court of the
District of Columbia within thirty days of this Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d). This is a final
appealable Order.
AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge
DATE: November 29, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunter v. District of Columbia Government (Hunter v. District of Columbia Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.