Hunter v. District of Columbia Government

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunter v. District of Columbia Government. Read the opinion of the Court — 905 F. Supp. 2d 364
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 29, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2009-1491·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ERNEST HUNTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1491 (ABJ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation [Dkt. # 71] as well as plaintiff’s objections [Dkt. # 72], and for the reasons

stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 51] is DENIED;

3. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 66] is

GRANTED as to the remaining portions of Counts I and II; and

4. Counts IV and V are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff Ernest Hunter may re-file his state law claims in the Superior Court of the

District of Columbia within thirty days of this Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d). This is a final

appealable Order.

AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge

DATE: November 29, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter v. District of Columbia Government, (D.D.C. 2012).

Hunter v. District of Columbia Government (Hunter v. District of Columbia Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supplemental jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367(d)