Hunt v. State
719 So. 2d 394, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13892, 1998 WL 771424
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 4, 1998·No. No. 97-3641·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
The appellant argues, the state concedes, and we hold that the inability of the court reporter to prepare transcripts of the trial and the stipulated impossibility of reconstructing the record require reversal of the judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial. Fairell v. State, 662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Felton v. State, 523 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Rozier v. State, 669 So.2d 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. State, 719 So. 2d 394, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13892, 1998 WL 771424 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
719 So. 2d 394 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vilsaint v. State
890 So. 2d 1293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)