Hunt v. State

719 So. 2d 394, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13892, 1998 WL 771424
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 4, 1998
DocketNo. 97-3641
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 So. 2d 394 (Hunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. State, 719 So. 2d 394, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13892, 1998 WL 771424 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The appellant argues, the state concedes, and we hold that the inability of the court reporter to prepare transcripts of the trial and the stipulated impossibility of reconstructing the record require reversal of the judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial. Fairell v. State, 662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Felton v. State, 523 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Rozier v. State, 669 So.2d 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vilsaint v. State
890 So. 2d 1293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 So. 2d 394, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13892, 1998 WL 771424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.