Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hunt v. State

Hunt v. State

673 So. 2d 969, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5456, 1996 WL 273721
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 659 So. 2d 363 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1996·No. No. 95-1750·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. We do not consider the ineffective assistance of counsel argument, and make no determination on the merits thereof, since we believe that such argument in this case would be more appropriately addressed in collateral proceedings under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. State, 673 So. 2d 969, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5456, 1996 WL 273721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 969 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.