Hunt v. Shinseki

Opinion

Case: 12-7039 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________

ANTHONY G. HUNT, Claimant-Appellant,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. __________________________

2012-7039 __________________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4707, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel. __________________________

ON MOTION __________________________

ORDER

Anthony G. Hunt moves to supplement his brief with further points and authorities, which he also refers to as a motion for mandamus. Case: 12-7039 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 04/04/2013

HUNT v. SHINSEKI 2

Mr. Hunt’s motion provides additional arguments re- garding the merits of his case. We deem it the best course to treat his motion as a supplement to his brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to supplement his brief is granted. A copy of Mr. Hunt’s supplemental brief will be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case.

FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s24