Hunt v. Shinseki
This text of 383 F. App'x 939 (Hunt v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hunt appeals from the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) affirming the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“the Board”) denying entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disability. Hunt v. Shinseki, — Fed.Appx. -, 2009 WL 1904343 (2009). Hunt argues that the Veterans Court erred in its interpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1) by accepting the reasons and bases set forth by the Board for rejecting certain evidence and by not independently reviewing those reasons for adequacy and justification. In effect, Hunt is asking this court to review factual determinations. Such review is outside the scope of our jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 F. App'x 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-shinseki-cafc-2010.