Hunt v. Shinseki

383 F. App'x 939
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 15, 2010·No. No. 2009-7134·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hunt appeals from the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) affirming the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“the Board”) denying entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric disability. Hunt v. Shinseki, — Fed.Appx. -, 2009 WL 1904343 (2009). Hunt argues that the Veterans Court erred in its interpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1) by accepting the reasons and bases set forth by the Board for rejecting certain evidence and by not independently reviewing those reasons for adequacy and justification. In effect, Hunt is asking this court to review factual determinations. Such review is outside the scope of our jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Shinseki, 383 F. App'x 939 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

383 F. App'x 939 (Hunt v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Li Cai v. Department of Homeland Security
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024
Edward Hamel v. Department of Homeland Security
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023
Dennis Chiappetta v. Dennis Chiappetta, Jr.
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022
Rodney Cowan v. Office of Special Counsel
2022 MSPB 2 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
PHH Corporation v. CFPB
D.C. Circuit, 2018
Social Security Administration v. Sridhar Boini
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016
Charles R. Lane v. Office of Personnel Management
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015