Hunt v. Ciminelli-Cowper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunt v. Ciminelli-Cowper Co.

66 A.D.3d 1511, 885 N.Y.S.2d 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 2009

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.3d 1511 (Hunt v. Ciminelli-Cowper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Ciminelli-Cowper Co., 66 A.D.3d 1511, 885 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered July 28, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted the motions of third-party defendants for summary judgment dismissing the amended third-party complaint and all cross claims against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion of third-party defendant Ingalls Site Development, Inc., formerly known as David Ogiony Development Co., Inc., and reinstating the amended third-party complaint and cross claim against it, and by denying in part the motion of third-party defendant Pet-tit & Pettit, Inc. and reinstating the third and fourth causes of action and cross claim against it, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hunt v Ciminelli-Cowper Co., Inc. (66 AD3d 1506 [2009]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered July 28, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted the motions of third-party defendants for summary judgment dismissing the amended third-party complaint and all cross claims against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion of third-party defendant Ingalls Site Development, Inc., formerly known as David Ogiony Development Co., Inc., and reinstating the amended third-party complaint and cross claim against it, and by denying in part the motion of third-party defendant Pet-tit & Pettit, Inc. and reinstating the third and fourth causes of action and cross claim against it, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hunt v Ciminelli-Cowper Co., Inc. (66 AD3d 1506 [2009]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.3d 1511, 885 N.Y.S.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-ciminelli-cowper-co-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack