Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission

266 F.2d 232
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 3, 1959·No. 17256_1·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

[233]*233JONES, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case to the four cases decided today which are styled Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 222; Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 285; Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 234; and Richardson v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 233.

In material respects the facts in this case are not different from those in Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, supra. In the Sun Oil Company case a new contract for supplying natural gas became effective upon the expiration of an earlier contract. Here a contract was cancelled before its expiration date and superseded by a subsequent agreement fixing a higher rate. The principles announced in the Sun Oil Company case are, a fortiori, applicable in this case. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in the Sun Oil opinion, the orders of the Federal Power Commission are

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 266 F.2d 232 (5th Cir. 1959).

266 F.2d 232 (Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission
266 F.2d 222 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission
266 F.2d 232 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
S. W. Richardson v. Federal Power Commission
266 F.2d 233 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)