Hunscom v. Hunscom
This text of 15 Mass. 184 (Hunscom v. Hunscom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The disbelief of a future state of existence goes only to the credibility of a witness
This was a libel for a divorce a vinculo. On the trial, a witness being offered to prove the adultery, Wilson, for the respondent, objected to his being sworn, and founded his objection to the competency of the witness upon his professed disbelief of a future state of existence, and offered to prove his repeated declarations of such disbelief. But the Court admitted him to be sworn, and said the objection went only to his credibility,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Mass. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunscom-v-hunscom-mass-1818.