Humphreys v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Humphreys v. State

984 N.E.2d 1231, 2013 WL 1349279, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 242

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 2013

DocketNo. 79S04-1212-CR-670

StatusPublished

This text of 984 N.E.2d 1231 (Humphreys v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Humphreys v. State, 984 N.E.2d 1231, 2013 WL 1349279, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 242 (Ind. 2013).

Pincite

Opinions

PUBLISHED ORDER

By order dated December 10, 2012, the Court granted a petition seeking transfer of jurisdiction from the Court of Appeals. After further review, including considering the points presented by counsel at oral argument and discussion among the Justices in conference after the oral argument, the Court has determined that it should not assume jurisdiction over this appeal and that the Court of Appeals not-for-publication memorandum decision, Andrew Humphreys v. State, No. 79A04-1112-CR-677, 2012 WL 4344198 (Ind.Ct.App. Sept. 24, 2012), should be reinstated as a memorandum decision. See Appellate Rule 65(D). Accordingly, the order granting transfer is VACATED, and transfer is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 58(B), this appeal is at an end.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to certify this appeal as final and to send copies of this order to the Hon. Margret G. Robb, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals; the Court of Appeals Administrator; and all counsel of record.

The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to LexisNexis and to Thomson/Reuters for publication on-line and in the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions.

DICKSON, C.J., and DAVID and MASSA, JJ., concur. RUSH, J. dissents with separate opinion in which RUCKER, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PUBLISHED ORDER

By order dated December 10, 2012, the Court granted a petition seeking transfer of jurisdiction from the Court of Appeals. After further review, including considering the points presented by counsel at oral argument and discussion among the Justices in conference after the oral argument, the Court has determined that it should not assume jurisdiction over this appeal and that the Court of Appeals not-for-publication memorandum decision, Andrew Humphreys v. State, No. 79A04-1112-CR-677, 2012 WL 4344198 (Ind.Ct.App. Sept. 24, 2012), should be reinstated as a memorandum decision. See Appellate Rule 65(D). Accordingly, the order granting transfer is VACATED, and transfer is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Appellate Rule 58(B), this appeal is at an end.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to certify this appeal as final and to send copies of this order to the Hon. Margret G. Robb, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals; the Court of Appeals Administrator; and all counsel of record.

The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to LexisNexis and to Thomson/Reuters for publication on-line and in the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions.

DICKSON, C.J., and DAVID and MASSA, JJ., concur. RUSH, J. dissents with separate opinion in which RUCKER, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

984 N.E.2d 1231, 2013 WL 1349279, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphreys-v-state-ind-2013.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack