Humphreys v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.

Supreme Court

Humphreys v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.

254 U.S. 613, 41 S. Ct. 62, 65 L. Ed. 438, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1133

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 15, 1920

DocketNo. 349

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 613 (Humphreys v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Humphreys v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co., 254 U.S. 613, 41 S. Ct. 62, 65 L. Ed. 438, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1133 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Motion to affirm or place on the summary docket submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Gaar Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271 (and see Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Meese, 239 U. S. 614, 619). (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618, 621; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U. S. 20, 24. (3) New York Central R. R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, 198; Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U. S. 219, 234; Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 249 U. S. 152, 163; Arizona Employers Liability Cases, 250 U. S. 400. (4) Palmer v. Ohio, 248 U. S. 32, 34. Mr. Alan D. Cole for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin A. Swingle, Mr. E. L. Worthington and Mr. LeWright Browning for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Motion to affirm or place on the summary docket submitted November 8, 1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Gaar Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271 (and see Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Meese, 239 U. S. 614, 619). (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618, 621; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U. S. 20, 24. (3) New York Central R. R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188, 198; Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U. S. 219, 234; Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 249 U. S. 152, 163; Arizona Employers Liability Cases, 250 U. S. 400. (4) Palmer v. Ohio, 248 U. S. 32, 34. Mr. Alan D. Cole for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin A. Swingle, Mr. E. L. Worthington and Mr. LeWright Browning for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 613, 41 S. Ct. 62, 65 L. Ed. 438, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphreys-v-bates-rogers-construction-co-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack