Humphrey v. Goord

42 A.D.3d 845, 839 N.Y.S.2d 859
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 26, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination which found him guilty of unauthorized exchange.1 We now confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence, hearing testimony and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Morgan v Goord, 10 AD3d 792, 792 [2004]). Petitioner’s innocent explanation created a credibility issue that was properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rizzuto v Goord, 35 AD3d 1075, 1075 [2006]). Petitioner’s remaining claims, to the extent preserved, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.2

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Humphrey v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 845, 839 N.Y.S.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

42 A.D.3d 845 (Humphrey v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haden v. Selsky
57 A.D.3d 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Harrison v. Bertone
51 A.D.3d 1350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)