Harrison v. Bertone

51 A.D.3d 1350, 860 N.Y.S.2d 641
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 29, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 51 A.D.3d 1350 (Harrison v. Bertone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. Bertone, 51 A.D.3d 1350, 860 N.Y.S.2d 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Having given another inmate two batteries, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized exchange of personal property. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and hearing testimony from both petitioner and the inmate to whom he gave the batteries (see Matter of Harvey v Goord, 47 AD3d 1096, 1096 [2008]). Petitioner’s conclusory assertion that he had received the appropriate permission to loan the batteries created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Humphrey v Goord, 42 AD3d 845, 845 [2007]). To the extent preserved, we have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that the penalty imposed was excessive, and find them to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Afrika v. Blackman
149 A.D.3d 1369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
MatterofOmarovFischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Omaro v. Fischer
119 A.D.3d 1253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
A'Gard v. LaValley
104 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Moss v. Bezio
63 A.D.3d 1470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.3d 1350, 860 N.Y.S.2d 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-bertone-nyappdiv-2008.