Humes v. Town of Hempstead
This text of 166 A.D.2d 503 (Humes v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Town of Hempstead appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated May 17, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
[504]*504Although the plaintiffs complaint did not plead that the town had received prior written notice of the defect in the playground where he was injured, in accordance with the Town of Hempstead Code § 6-4, nevertheless the plaintiff did allege that the town had affirmatively created the defective condition, thus obviating the need for pleading or proving written notice (see, Haviland v Smith, 91 AD2d 764), and, under the circumstances, raising an issue of fact best resolved by a trial of the action. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.D.2d 503, 560 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humes-v-town-of-hempstead-nyappdiv-1990.