Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs

365 A.2d 929, 71 N.J. 401, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 163
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 16, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 365 A.2d 929 (Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs, 365 A.2d 929, 71 N.J. 401, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 163 (N.J. 1976).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this matter involving the correctness of an assessment for taxes on a parcel of property leased to Humble Oil and Refining Company and used as a gasoline service station, the grant of certification was limited to the issue of the correctness of the Appellate Division determination concerning the method of capitalizing net income, particularly with reference to its conformance with this Court’s decision in New Brunswick v. State of N. J. Div. of Tax Appeals, 39 N. J. 537 (1963). The parties were also requested to brief the question of prejudiciality of the Appellate Division decision if found to be erroneous in that regard.

We find the decision of the Appellate Division to be correct and affirm its judgment substantially for the reasons set forth in its opinion reported at 135 N. J. Super. 26 (1975). Implicit in the Appellate Division’s decision is the finding that the net annual' rental was the fair rental value before taxes. Under those circumstances, capitalizing the net income before taxes is not inconsistent with New Brunswick. However, we do not subscribe to that part of the Appellate Division opinion which indicated that even if it were shown that the rent payable under the ground lease were out of line with the fair rental value during the tax years in question (the Appellate Division found otherwise), the [403]*403ground lease would still be highly relevant in determining the value of the property for tax purposes.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
MSGW Real Estate Fund, LLC v. Borough of Mountain Lakes
18 N.J. Tax 364 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1998)
Hull Junction Holding Corp. v. Princeton Borough
16 N.J. Tax 68 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1996)
Livingston Mall Corp. v. Livingston Township
15 N.J. Tax 505 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1996)
RTC Properties v. Town of Kearny
13 N.J. Tax 146 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1993)
United Jersey Bank v. Lincoln Park Borough
11 N.J. Tax 549 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1991)
National Westminster Bank New Jersey v. City of Brigantine
11 N.J. Tax 502 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1991)
Lawrence Associates v. Lawrence Township
5 N.J. Tax 481 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1983)
Supervisor of Assessments v. Ort Children Trust Four
448 A.2d 947 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
Exxon Corp. v. East Brunswick Tp.
5 N.J. Tax 216 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1982)
J. C. T. Associates v. Boonton Town
4 N.J. Tax 283 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1982)
Buchler v. Borough of Fort Lee
2 N.J. Tax 228 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1981)
Korvettes Home Furnishing Center v. Borough of Elmwood Park
1 N.J. Tax 287 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1980)
Fourth Fairland, Inc. v. Township of Hazlet
1 N.J. Tax 254 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1980)
Almax Builders, Inc. v. City of Perth Amboy
1 N.J. Tax 31 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1980)
State v. Sun Oil Company
390 A.2d 661 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Schere v. Township of Freehold
375 A.2d 1218 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs
365 A.2d 929 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 A.2d 929, 71 N.J. 401, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humble-oil-refining-co-v-borough-of-englewood-cliffs-nj-1976.