Humana Kansas City, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co.
This text of 94 F.3d 648 (Humana Kansas City, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
94 F.3d 648
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
HUMANA KANSAS CITY, INC., f/k/a Prime Health Kansas City,
Inc., d/b/a Humana Prime Health Plan, Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, one of the CNA Insurance
Companies, Appellee.
No. 96-1139.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 10, 1996.
Filed: August 5, 1996.
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, and ROSENBAUM,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Humana Kansas City, Inc., appeals the district court's2 grant of summary judgment to defendant in its bad faith action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears, and that an opinion would lack precedential value.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 F.3d 648, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37233, 1996 WL 436993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humana-kansas-city-inc-v-continental-cas-co-ca8-1996.