Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hull v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Hull v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

113 A.D. 888, 98 N.Y.S. 1104
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D. 888 (Hull v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hull v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 113 A.D. 888, 98 N.Y.S. 1104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All. concurred, except P. and Nash, J., who dissented and voted for reversal on the ground that the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses that the locomotive was subjected to frequent and thorough inspection by competent inspectors is uncontradicted, and that there should have been a dismissal of the complaint upon this ground. (Smith v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 164 N. Y. 491 ; Biddiscomb v. Cameron, 35 App. Div. 561 ; affd., 161 N. Y. 637.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Biddiscombe v. . Cameron
57 N.E. 1118 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Smith v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
58 N.E. 656 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Biddiscomb v. Cameron
35 A.D. 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D. 888, 98 N.Y.S. 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hull-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1906.