Biddiscombe v. . Cameron
57 N.E. 1118, 161 N.Y. 637, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1482
This text of 57 N.E. 1118 (Biddiscombe v. . Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Biddiscombe v. . Cameron, 57 N.E. 1118, 161 N.Y. 637, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1482 (N.Y. 1900).
Opinion
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion
All concur, except Martin, J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hull v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
113 A.D. 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Starer v. Stern
100 A.D. 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Koehler v. New York Steam Co.
84 A.D. 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Hubener v. Heide
73 A.D. 200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 N.E. 1118, 161 N.Y. 637, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biddiscombe-v-cameron-ny-1900.