Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. Roberts
This text of 528 N.E.2d 1221 (Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (129 AD2d 348). We find especially persuasive the absence of any language in Labor Law § 220-b (3) (b) authorizing the extension of liability for penalties and possible debarment to successor corporations (cf., Public Authorities Law §§ 2601, 2602; General Municipal Law §§ 103-a, 103-b; State Finance Law §§ 139-a, 139-b).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Alexander concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to modify in an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 N.E.2d 1221, 72 N.Y.2d 900, 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1599, 532 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hull-hazard-inc-v-roberts-ny-1988.