Davis v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. Kelly

145 A.D.2d 950, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 145 A.D.2d 950 (Davis v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Kelly, 145 A.D.2d 950, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Since the petition in this article 78 proceeding raised a substantial evidence question, Special Term should not have ruled on the legal issues raised therein (CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Hop-Wah v Coughlin, 118 AD2d 275, revd on other grounds 69 NY2d 791; Matter of Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 129 AD2d 348, 350, affd 72 NY2d 900). Reviewing the matter as if it had been properly transferred, we conclude that each of petitioner’s legal claims lacks merit and that the determination is supported by substantial evidence. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Newman, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Since the petition in this article 78 proceeding raised a substantial evidence question, Special Term should not have ruled on the legal issues raised therein (CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Hop-Wah v Coughlin, 118 AD2d 275, revd on other grounds 69 NY2d 791; Matter of Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 129 AD2d 348, 350, affd 72 NY2d 900). Reviewing the matter as if it had been properly transferred, we conclude that each of petitioner’s legal claims lacks merit and that the determination is supported by substantial evidence. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Newman, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 A.D.2d 950, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack