Huguenin v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Huguenin v. Commissioner

838 A.2d 209, 267 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 541

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 8, 2003·No. SC 17103·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petitioner Marcel Huguenin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23247) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the petitioner’s appeal on the ground that the ex post facto issue raised by the petitioner was not debatable among jurists of reason?”

[905] Decided December 8, 2003 Sandra J. Crowell, assistant public defender, and Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner Marcel Huguenin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23247) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the petitioner’s appeal on the ground that the ex post facto issue raised by the petitioner was not debatable among jurists of reason?”

[905] Decided December 8, 2003 Sandra J. Crowell, assistant public defender, and Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, in support of the petition.

Huguenin v. Commissioner, 838 A.2d 209, 267 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 541 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

838 A.2d 209 (Huguenin v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related