Huguenin v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Huguenin v. Commissioner

838 A.2d 209, 267 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 541

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 8, 2003

DocketSC 17103

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 838 A.2d 209 (Huguenin v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huguenin v. Commissioner, 838 A.2d 209, 267 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 541 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner Marcel Huguenin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23247) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the petitioner’s appeal on the ground that the ex post facto issue raised by the petitioner was not debatable among jurists of reason?”

[905]*905Decided December 8, 2003 Sandra J. Crowell, assistant public defender, and Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner Marcel Huguenin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 23247) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the petitioner’s appeal on the ground that the ex post facto issue raised by the petitioner was not debatable among jurists of reason?”

[905]*905Decided December 8, 2003 Sandra J. Crowell, assistant public defender, and Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, in support of the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

838 A.2d 209, 267 Conn. 904, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huguenin-v-commissioner-conn-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack