Hugo Fluellen v. State
This text of Hugo Fluellen v. State (Hugo Fluellen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-13-00232-CR
HUGO FLUELLEN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 115th District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial Court No. 16,405
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. ORDER Hugo Fluellen appeals from his conviction for indecency with a child. Fluellen’s brief was
originally due February 18, 2014. Counsel is appointed.
Efforts from our clerk’s office to obtain the appellant’s brief and/or a motion to extend the
briefing deadline proved unproductive; consequently, we sent a late brief notice to appellant’s
counsel, Charles van Cleef, on April 14, 2014, advising him of the late status of the brief and
establishing a new deadline—April 29—for filing the brief. We also warned van Cleef that his
failure to file the brief could result in abatement to the trial court for a hearing in accordance with
Rule 38.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).
We have not been contacted by counsel and have received neither appellant’s brief nor a
motion to extend the briefing deadline.
Because the brief has not been filed and counsel has failed to contact this Court or pursue
the appeal, we abate this case to the trial court pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure for a hearing to determine why counsel has not filed the brief, whether the
brief can be promptly filed with this Court, whether Fluellen desires to prosecute this appeal, and
whether he is indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The trial court may also address other
matters as it deems appropriate, including appointing different counsel for appellant, if
necessary. The hearing is to be conducted within fifteen days of the date of this order.
The trial court’s findings and recommendations on the issues set forth above shall be
entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the form of a supplemental
clerk’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). The
2 reporter’s record of the hearing shall also be filed with this Court in the form of a supplemental
reporter’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See id.
All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of (1) the appellant’s
brief or (2) the supplemental appellate record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: May 20, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hugo Fluellen v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugo-fluellen-v-state-texapp-2014.