Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

113 A.D.2d 1031, 494 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52695
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1985·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Motions to reargue granted to the extent that reargument granted and, upon reargument, order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, in accordance with the following memorandum: Upon reargument, we find that National Grange Mutual Insurance Company submitted the necessary certificate of mailing, stamped by a post-office employee, showing that on July 23, 1981, a notice of cancellation was sent to the insured at the address listed on the policy. Thus, defendant is entitled to a judgment declaring that its policy issued to Hughson was effectively canceled pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) and was not in effect at the time of the accident (see, Olesky v Travelers Ins. Co., 72 AD2d 924). Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Insurance, 113 A.D.2d 1031, 494 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

113 A.D.2d 1031 (Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance
286 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Meutsch v. Travelers Insurance
198 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Abuhamra v. New York Mutual Underwriters
170 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)