Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
This text of 110 A.D.2d 1072 (Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An insurer may effectively cancel its policy by mailing a notice of cancellation to the address shown on the policy, provided that it submits sufficient proof of mailing, regardless of whether the notice is actually received by the insured (Olesky v Travelers Ins. Co., 72 AD2d 924, 925). Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) (b) states that “[a] copy of a notice of termination and the certificate of mailing, when kept in the regular course of the insurer’s business, shall constitute conclusive proof of compliance with the mailing requirements of this chapter”. Inasmuch as the record does not include the certificate of mailing, the matter should proceed to trial, where the court may determine whether National Grange complied with the statute. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Tillman, J. — [1073]*1073declaratory judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 1072, 488 N.Y.S.2d 930, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughson-v-national-grange-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1985.