Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 18, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00949·Unknown

Opinion

1 JAMES T. CONLEY SBN 224174 james.conley@ogletree.com 2 HAIDY M. RIVERA SBN 322117 haidy.rivera@ogletree.com 3 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 4 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2800 Sacramento, CA 95814 5 Telephone: 916-840-3150 Facsimile: 916-840-3159 6

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHELLE HUGHES, an individual, Case No. 1:23-cv-00949-JLT-BAM

12 Plaintiff, AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v.

14 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Complaint Filed: May 24, 2023 Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through Trial Date: September 9, 2025 15 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties (“Parties”), by and through their 2 respective counsel of record, that in order to facilitate the exchange of information and documents 3 which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, 4 and privacy rights, the Parties stipulate as follows: 5 1. In this Stipulation and Protective Order, the words set forth below shall have the 6 following meanings: 7 a. “Proceeding” means the above-entitled proceeding, Case No. 1:23-cv-00949-JLT- 8 BAM. 9 b. “Court” means the Hon. Jennifer L. Thurston, or any other judge to which this 10 Proceeding may be assigned, including Court staff participating in such proceedings. 11 c. “Confidential” means any Documents, Testimony, or Information which is in the 12 possession of a Designating Party who believes in good faith that such Documents, Testimony, or 13 Information is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. 14 d. “Confidential Materials” means any Documents, Testimony, or Information as 15 defined below designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulation and 16 Protective Order. 17 e. “Highly Confidential” means any information which belongs to a Designating Party 18 who believes in good faith that the Disclosure of such information to another Party or non-Party 19 would create a substantial risk of serious and/or substantial harm including misuse or 20 misrepresentation of the data or the test, financial, or other injury that cannot be avoided by less 21 restrictive means. 22 f. “Highly Confidential Materials” means any Documents, Testimony, or Information, 23 as defined below, designated as “Highly Confidential” pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulation 24 and Protective Order. 25 g. “Designating Party” means the Party that designates Documents, Testimony, or 26 Information, as defined below, as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” 27 h. “Disclose” or “Disclosed” or “Disclosure” means to reveal, divulge, give, or make 28 1 i. “Documents” means (i) any “Writing,” “Original,” and “Duplicate” as those terms 2 are defined by California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, and 260, which have been produced in 3 discovery in this Proceeding by any person or entity, and (ii) any copies, reproductions, or 4 summaries of all or any part of the foregoing. 5 j. “Information” means the content of Documents or Testimony. 6 k. “Testimony” means all depositions, declarations, or other testimony taken or used in 7 this Proceeding. 8 2. The Designating Party shall have the right to designate as “Highly Confidential” 9 only the non-public Documents, Testimony, or Information that the Designating Party in good faith 10 believes would create a substantial risk of serious and/or substantial harm including misuse or 11 misrepresentation of the data or the test, financial, serious financial or other injury, if Disclosed to 12 another Party or non-Party, and that such risk cannot be avoided by less restrictive means. These 13 would include raw data, interpretive reports, and/or scoring manual excerpts. 14 3. The entry of this Stipulation and Protective Order does not alter, waive, modify, or 15 abridge any right, privilege, or protection otherwise available to any Party with respect to the 16 discovery of matters, including but not limited to any Party’s right to assert the attorney-client 17 privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or other privileges, or any Party’s right to contest any 18 such assertion. 19 4. Any Documents, Testimony, or Information to be designated as “Confidential” or 20 “Highly Confidential” must be clearly so designated before the Document, Testimony, or 21 Information is Disclosed or produced. The parties may agree that a case name and number are to be 22 part of the “Highly Confidential” designation. The “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” 23 designation should not obscure or interfere with the legibility of the designated Information. 24 a. For Documents (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 25 proceedings), the Designating Party must affix the legend “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” 26 on each page of any Document containing such designated material. 27 b. For Testimony given in depositions the Designating Party may either: 28 1 “Highly Confidential” Testimony, by specifying all portions of the Testimony that qualify as 2 “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential;” or 3 ii. designate the entirety of the Testimony at the deposition as “Confidential” or 4 “Highly Confidential” (before the deposition is concluded) with the right to identify more specific 5 portions of the Testimony as to which protection is sought within 30 days following receipt of the 6 deposition transcript. In circumstances where portions of the deposition Testimony are designated 7 for protection, the transcript pages containing “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” Information 8 may be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each page the legend 9 “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” as instructed by the Designating Party. 10 c. For Information produced in some form other than Documents, and for any other 11 tangible items, including, without limitation, compact discs or DVDs, the Designating Party must 12 affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the Information or 13 item is stored the legend “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” If only portions of the 14 Information or item warrant protection, the Designating Party, to the extent practicable, shall 15 identify the “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” portions. 16 5. The inadvertent production by any of the undersigned Parties or non-Parties to the 17 Proceedings of any Document, Testimony, or Information during discovery in this Proceeding 18 without a “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” designation, shall be without prejudice to any 19 claim that such item is “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” and such Party shall not be held to 20 have waived any rights by such inadvertent production. In the event that any Document, 21 Testimony, or Information that is subject to a “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” designation 22 is inadvertently produced without such designation, the Party that inadvertently produced the 23 document shall give written notice of such inadvertent production within twenty (20) days of 24 discovery of the inadvertent production, together with a further copy of the subject Document, 25 Testimony, or Information designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” (the “Inadvertent 26 Production Notice”). Upon receipt of such Inadvertent Production Notice, the Party that received 27 the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony, or Information shall promptly destroy the 28 1 expense of the producing Party, return such together with all copies of such Document, Testimony 2 or Information to counsel for the producing Party and shall retain only the “Confidential” or 3 “Highly Confidential” materials.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)