Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 5, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-00949
StatusUnknown

This text of Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 Christina R. Manalo, SBN 297718 JML LAW, A Professional Law Corporation 2 5855 Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite 300 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 3 Telephone: 818-610-8800 Facsimile: 818-610-3030 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHELLE HUGHES 5 6 JAMES T. CONLEY Bar No. 224174 james.conley@ogletree.com 7 HAIDY RIVERA Bar No. 322117 haidy.rivera@ogletree.com 8 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 9 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2800 Sacramento, CA 95814 10 Telephone: 916-840-3150 Facsimile: 916-840-3159 11 Attorneys for Defendant 12 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 MICHELLE HUGHES, an individual, Case No. 1:23-cv-00949-JLT-BAM

17 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] AGREED 18 vs. CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER

19 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 Action Filed: May 24, 2023 Defendants. Removal Filed: June 23, 2023 21 Trial Date: September 9, 2025

22 AGREED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER 23 24 The parties have agreed to and have submitted to the Court, and for good cause shown the 25 Court hereby enters, the following Confidentiality Order: 26 1. This Order shall govern the disclosure of materials designated as Confidential 27 Material in this litigation. Confidential Material, as used in this Order, shall refer to any document 28 or item designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only, including but not 1 limited to, documents or items produced during discovery, all copies thereof, and the information 2 contained in such material. Nothing in this Order shall require any party to produce any specific 3 documents or category of documents which a party deems inappropriate for production. 4 Definitions of Confidential Material 5 2. Confidential Material, as used in this Order, consists of the following materials and 6 categories of materials: 7 a. Materials relating to any privileged, confidential, or nonpublic 8 information, including, but not limited to, trade secrets, research, 9 design, development, financial, technical, marketing, planning, 10 personal, or commercial information, as such terms are used in the 11 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ.) and any applicable 12 case law interpreting Fed. R. Civ. 26(c)(1)(G); contracts; non-public 13 compilations of retail prices; proprietary information; vendor 14 agreements; personnel files; claim/litigation information; and 15 nonpublic policies and procedures shall be deemed Confidential. 16 b. Materials containing corporate trade secrets, nonpublic research and 17 development data, including, but not limited to, cost data, pricing 18 formulas, inventory management programs, and other sales or 19 business information not known to the public; information obtained 20 from a non-party pursuant to a non-disclosure agreement; and 21 customer-related Protected Data shall be deemed Highly Confidential 22 – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. 23 c. Protected Data shall refer to any information that a party believes in 24 good faith to be subject to federal, state or foreign data protection laws 25 or other privacy obligations. Examples of such data protection laws 26 include but are not limited to The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 27 § 6801 et seq. (financial information); and, The Health Insurance 28 1 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164 (medical information). 2 Certain Protected Data may compel alternative or additional 3 protections beyond those afforded Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ 4 Eyes Only material, in which event the parties shall meet and confer 5 in good faith, and, if unsuccessful, shall move the Court for 6 appropriate relief. 7 The parties shall not designate as confidential information that is already public knowledge. 8 3. The parties agree that such Confidential Material as described in paragraph 2 should 9 be given the protection of an order of this Court to prevent injury through disclosure to persons other 10 than those persons involved in the prosecution or defense of this litigation. 11 Procedure for Designating Information as Confidential 12 4. To designate information as confidential, the producing party shall mark Confidential 13 Material with the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 14 EYES ONLY.” Parties shall submit confidential discovery responses, such as answers to 15 interrogatories or answers to requests for admissions, in a separate document stamped with the 16 appropriate legend designating those responses as Confidential Material. The Receiving Party may 17 make copies of Confidential Material and such copies shall become subject to the same protections 18 as the Confidential Material from which those copies were made. 19 a. Information on a disk or other electronic format (e.g., a native 20 format production) may be designated confidential by marking the 21 storage medium itself (or the native file’s title) with the legend 22 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 23 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” The Receiving Party shall mark any 24 hard-copy printouts and the storage medium of any permissible copies 25 of such electronic material with the corresponding legend contained 26 on the original and such copies shall become subject to the same 27 protections, as the Confidential Material from which those copies were 28 made. 1 b. Information disclosed at any deposition of a party taken in this 2 action may be designated by the party as confidential by indicating on 3 the record at the deposition that the information is confidential and 4 subject to the provisions of this Order. Alternatively, the party may 5 designate information disclosed at the deposition as confidential by 6 notifying the court reporter and other parties in writing, within fifteen 7 (15) business days of receipt of the transcript, of the specific pages and 8 lines of the transcript which are designated as confidential. The parties 9 may agree to a reasonable extension of the 15-business-day period for 10 designation. Designations of transcripts will apply to audio, video, or 11 other recordings of the testimony. During such 15-business-day 12 period, the entire transcript shall receive confidential treatment. Upon 13 such designation, the court reporter and each party shall affix the 14 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 15 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” legend to the designated pages and 16 segregate them as appropriate. 17 5. A producing party may change the confidentiality designation of materials it has 18 produced, as follows: (1) The producing party must give the receiving parties notice of the change 19 by identifying the documents or information at issue. Once notice is given, the receiving party must 20 make good-faith efforts to ensure that the documents or information are accorded treatment under 21 the new designation. (2) Within a reasonable period after giving notice, the producing party must 22 reproduce the documents or information in a format that contains the new designation. (3) If such 23 information has been disclosed to persons not qualified pursuant to paragraphs 12-13 below, the 24 party who disclosed such information shall (a) take reasonable efforts to retrieve previously disclosed 25 Confidential Material; (b) advise such persons that the material is Confidential; and (c) give the 26 producing party written assurance that steps (a) and (b) have been completed. 27 /// 28 1 Data Security 2 6. The Parties agree to provide adequate security to protect data produced by the other 3 party(ies) or by non-parties. This includes secure data storage systems, established security policies, 4 and security training for employees, contractors and experts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-wal-mart-associates-inc-caed-2024.