Hughes v. State

74 So. 3d 1103, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16269, 2011 WL 4905759
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hughes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16878
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2011·No. 1D10-5396·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, John Wallace Hughes, III, challenges his two convictions and sentences for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. As properly conceded by the State, Appellant’s convictions and sentences violate double jeopardy because they were based on the possession of multiple firearms at the same time. Hill v. State, 711 So.2d 1221, 1224-25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (holding that because the word “any” preceded the list of items a felon was prohibited from possessing, the prohibition against double jeopardy precluded more than one conviction for the possession of multiple firearms at the same time). We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions for the trial court to vacate one of Appellant’s convictions and sentences.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes v. State, 74 So. 3d 1103, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16269, 2011 WL 4905759 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

74 So. 3d 1103 (Hughes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
711 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)