Hughes v. State

20 So. 3d 950, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505, 2009 WL 3102990
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 2009·No. 3D08-245·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(Z). The record shows that, after retained counsel was permitted to withdraw, the defendant was not represented by counsel, as he was entitled at that critical stage. See Searcy v. State, 971 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), review denied, 988 So.2d 622 (Fla.2008). Because, in addition, and as the state agrees, it does not appear that inquiry was actually made as to his entitlement to court-appointed counsel, as he requested and as the court indicated it would, the order below is vacated and the cause remanded for a determination as to his entitlement to and appointment of the public defender if the defendant so qualifies.

Order vacated, cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes v. State, 20 So. 3d 950, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14505, 2009 WL 3102990 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

20 So. 3d 950 (Hughes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. State
20 So. 3d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)