Hughes v. State

967 So. 2d 968, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15918, 2007 WL 2935587
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 2007
DocketNo. 4D07-3240
StatusPublished

This text of 967 So. 2d 968 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. State, 967 So. 2d 968, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15918, 2007 WL 2935587 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks mandamus relief to require the trial judge to remove the designation of petitioner as a sexual offender as the judge originally ordered at sentencing. Since petitioner was convicted of an of[969]*969fense for which sexual offender designation is mandatory, the trial court had no authority to exempt a qualifying person from such designation. § 775.24, Fla. Stat. (2003). Mandamus relief is available only to require performance of legally authorized acts and thus cannot be invoked in this case. See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Smith, 673 So.2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Petition denied.

SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Smith
673 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
967 So. 2d 968, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15918, 2007 WL 2935587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.