Hughes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hughes v. State

66 So. 844, 11 Ala. App. 307, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 70

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 66 So. 844 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. State, 66 So. 844, 11 Ala. App. 307, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 70 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

What purports to be a bill of exceptions found in the record contains no exceptions, and is consequently not a bill of exceptions, and presents no rulings of the lower court for review. — Blackwell v. State, 8 Ala. App. 430, 62 South. 1034.

The indictment contains three counts, one for burglary, one for grand larceny, and one for receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be stolen. There was a general verdict of guilty, and the court adjudged the defendant guilty of burglary, and sentenced him to the penitentiary for three years. In this there was no error. — Cawley v. State, 37 Ala. 152; Johnson v. State, 50 Ala. 459; McGuff v. State, 88 Ala. 150, 7 South. 35, 10 Am. St. Rep. 25; Lucas v. State, 144 Ala. 63, 39 South. 822, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 412; Sampson v. State, 107 Ala. 76, 18 South. 207; Orr v. State, 107 Ala. 35, 18 South. 142; Rose v. State, 117 Ala. 77, 23 South. 638; Bell v. State, 48 Ala. 684, 17 Am. Rep. 40; Adams v. State, 55 Ala. 143.

No error being found in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

What purports to be a bill of exceptions found in the record contains no exceptions, and is consequently not a bill of exceptions, and presents no rulings of the lower court for review. — Blackwell v. State, 8 Ala. App. 430, 62 South. 1034.

The indictment contains three counts, one for burglary, one for grand larceny, and one for receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be stolen. There was a general verdict of guilty, and the court adjudged the defendant guilty of burglary, and sentenced him to the penitentiary for three years. In this there was no error. — Cawley v. State, 37 Ala. 152; Johnson v. State, 50 Ala. 459; McGuff v. State, 88 Ala. 150, 7 South. 35, 10 Am. St. Rep. 25; Lucas v. State, 144 Ala. 63, 39 South. 822, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 412; Sampson v. State, 107 Ala. 76, 18 South. 207; Orr v. State, 107 Ala. 35, 18 South. 142; Rose v. State, 117 Ala. 77, 23 South. 638; Bell v. State, 48 Ala. 684, 17 Am. Rep. 40; Adams v. State, 55 Ala. 143.

No error being found in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 So. 844, 11 Ala. App. 307, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-state-alactapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack