Hughes v. Hughes
1 N.J.L. 209
Opinion
The Court after taking time to consider the motion were of opinion that it must be refused, as there was no precedent to warrant it. They said the uniform course to prevent delay-had been to rule the defendant to put in bail in twenty days. [210]*210or sitting the court, and. that a rule to plead might be had at the same time to prevent the loss of a trial.
Motion refused»
Note — See 1 Tidd’s Pr. 343. 2 Sellon’s Pr. 271.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hughes v. Hughes, 1 N.J.L. 209 (N.J. 1794).
1 N.J.L. 209 (Hughes v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.