Hughes v. Hughes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hughes v. Hughes

1 N.J.L. 209

DecidedApril 15, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 209 (Hughes v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. Hughes, 1 N.J.L. 209 (N.J. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court after taking time to consider the motion were of opinion that it must be refused, as there was no precedent to warrant it. They said the uniform course to prevent delay-had been to rule the defendant to put in bail in twenty days. [210]*210or sitting the court, and. that a rule to plead might be had at the same time to prevent the loss of a trial.

Motion refused»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court after taking time to consider the motion were of opinion that it must be refused, as there was no precedent to warrant it. They said the uniform course to prevent delay-had been to rule the defendant to put in bail in twenty days. [210]*210or sitting the court, and. that a rule to plead might be had at the same time to prevent the loss of a trial.

Motion refused»

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J.L. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-hughes-nj-1794.