Hugh v. State

826 So. 2d 1103, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14274, 2002 WL 31202140
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2002
DocketNo. 5D01-2097
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 826 So. 2d 1103 (Hugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hugh v. State, 826 So. 2d 1103, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14274, 2002 WL 31202140 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (to be entitled to relief, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for the deficiency, the result of the proceeding would have been different).

THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyler v. State
826 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 So. 2d 1103, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14274, 2002 WL 31202140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugh-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.