Hugh v. State
751 So. 2d 718, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1468, 2000 WL 192183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hugh v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14274 →
Opinions
Because we find that the issues relating to ineffective assistance of counsel should be raised post-judgment, we affirm the trial court on those issues. See Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1999); Woodbury v. State, 730 So.2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); and Section 924.051, Fla. Stat. (1999).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hugh v. State, 751 So. 2d 718, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1468, 2000 WL 192183 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
751 So. 2d 718 (Hugh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kight v. State
512 So. 2d 922 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Jassan v. State
749 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Stewart v. State
420 So. 2d 862 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Goodwin v. State
751 So. 2d 537 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
State v. Causey
503 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.
685 So. 2d 773 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Jenkins v. State
747 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Bain v. State
730 So. 2d 296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Woodbury v. State
730 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)