Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., P.A. v. Barth

699 So. 2d 795, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10727, 1997 WL 586775
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 1997·No. No. 97-1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s response, the purported final judgment under review is summarily reversed pursuant to [796] Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(b), and the cause is remanded for entry of an order of the type set out in Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc., 512 So.2d 315, 319 n. 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).1 See Martinez v. Marin, 700 So.2d 439 (1997) and cases cited; Miami Columbus, Inc. v. Ramlawi, 687 So.2d 1378, 1381 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997).

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., P.A. v. Barth, 699 So. 2d 795, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10727, 1997 WL 586775 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

699 So. 2d 795 (Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., P.A. v. Barth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

East Avenue, LLC v. Insignia Bank
136 So. 3d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Molina v. Watkins
824 So. 2d 959 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)