Home/Supreme Court/Huggins v. Raines

Huggins v. Raines

374 U.S. 105, 83 S. Ct. 1688, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1283
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1963
Docket251, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 U.S. 105 (Huggins v. Raines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huggins v. Raines, 374 U.S. 105, 83 S. Ct. 1688, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1283 (1963).

Opinion

374 U.S. 105 (1963)

HUGGINS
v.
RAINES, WARDEN.

No. 251, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA.

Petitioner pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Lewis A. Wallace and Hugh H. Collum, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma for reconsideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, and Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huggins v. State
1964 OK CR 4 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 105, 83 S. Ct. 1688, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huggins-v-raines-scotus-1963.