Huffman, Warden v. Frazier
541 U.S. 1095, 124 S. Ct. 2815
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 7, 2004
Docket03-1382
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases
This text of 541 U.S. 1095 (Huffman, Warden v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Huffman, Warden v. Frazier, 541 U.S. 1095, 124 S. Ct. 2815 (2004).
Opinion
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *1096 granted. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mitchell v. Vasbinder
644 F. Supp. 2d 846 (E.D. Michigan, 2009)
Stallings v. Bagley
561 F. Supp. 2d 821 (N.D. Ohio, 2008)
Wilson v. Parker
Sixth Circuit, 2008
Fautenberry v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2008
Morales v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2007
Montgomery v. Bagley
482 F. Supp. 2d 919 (N.D. Ohio, 2007)
Apanovitch v. Houk
466 F.3d 460 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Poindexter v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2006
Dewaine Poindexter, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Betty Mitchell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
454 F.3d 564 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Keith v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2006
Kevin Keith v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
455 F.3d 662 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Arthur Tyler v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
416 F.3d 500 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Tyler v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2005
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
541 U.S. 1095, 124 S. Ct. 2815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-warden-v-frazier-scotus-2004.