Huffman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Huffman v. State

360 So. 2d 1045

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 14, 1978·No. 77-182·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

Huffman v. State, 360 So. 2d 1045 (Ala. 1978).

Pincite

360 So. 2d 1045 (Huffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related