Huffman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Huffman v. State

360 So. 2d 1045

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 14, 1978

Docket77-182

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 360 So. 2d 1045 (Huffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huffman v. State, 360 So. 2d 1045 (Ala. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10 (f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

360 So. 2d 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-state-ala-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack