Huffman v. . Ingold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Huffman v. . Ingold

114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 633, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 153

DecidedDecember 6, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 927 (Huffman v. . Ingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huffman v. . Ingold, 114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 633, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 153 (N.C. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury and wrongful killing.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appealed. This case was before us at the Spring Term, 1921, and is reported in181 N.C. 426. The facts, which are fully set out there, need not be repeated here. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the decision rendered on the first appeal, and the law appertaining to the new questions raised on the second trial. We have discovered no reversible error on the present appeal, and hence the judgment will be

Affirmed.

ADAMS, J., did not sit.

*Page 634

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury and wrongful killing.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appealed. This case was before us at the Spring Term, 1921, and is reported in181 N.C. 426. The facts, which are fully set out there, need not be repeated here. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the decision rendered on the first appeal, and the law appertaining to the new questions raised on the second trial. We have discovered no reversible error on the present appeal, and hence the judgment will be

Affirmed.

ADAMS, J., did not sit.

*Page 634

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 633, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-ingold-nc-1922.