Home/New York Court of Appeals/Huffe v. Jarcho

Huffe v. Jarcho

401 N.E.2d 219, 48 N.Y.2d 961, 425 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2556
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 17, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 401 N.E.2d 219 (Huffe v. Jarcho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huffe v. Jarcho, 401 N.E.2d 219, 48 N.Y.2d 961, 425 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2556 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

Motion for substitution of counsel granted and Schoffman and Skovronsky, Esqs., 50 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, substituted as counsel of record to appellants in the appeal herein in the place and stead of Alfred T. De Maria, Esq., and Herman Taub, Esq., without prejudice to any claims for attorneys’ fees or attorneys’ liens which Messrs. De Maria and Taub may wish to enforce in a court of original jurisdiction (see Matter of Elliott v Hoberman, 28 NY2d 898; Matter of Lydig, 262 NY 408).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.
187 N.E. 298 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Elliott v. Hoberman
271 N.E.2d 560 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 N.E.2d 219, 48 N.Y.2d 961, 425 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffe-v-jarcho-ny-1979.