Elliott v. Hoberman
271 N.E.2d 560, 28 N.Y.2d 898, 322 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1342
This text of 271 N.E.2d 560 (Elliott v. Hoberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Elliott v. Hoberman, 271 N.E.2d 560, 28 N.Y.2d 898, 322 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1342 (N.Y. 1971).
Opinion
Motion for substitution of counsel granted. The question of compensation raised in opposition to the motion is one for the court of original jurisdiction. (Matter of Lydig, 262 N. Y. 408; 1 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 3:101, p. 411.) [See 28 N Y 2d 530, mot. for rearg. granted 28 N Y 2d 859.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Huffe v. Jarcho
401 N.E.2d 219 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
271 N.E.2d 560, 28 N.Y.2d 898, 322 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-hoberman-ny-1971.