Huff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 2016·No. 2D15-1630·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN CECIL HUFF, DOC #498690 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1630 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed December 14, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge.

John Huff, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the postconviction court's denial of Huff's motion for

postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI

of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of

his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on

count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huff's right to file a legally sufficient

motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huff v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Huff v. State (Huff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.