Huff v. State
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JOHN CECIL HUFF, DOC #498690 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1630 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed December 14, 2016.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge.
John Huff, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the postconviction court's denial of Huff's motion for
postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI
of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of
his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on
count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huff's right to file a legally sufficient
motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huff v. State (Huff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.