Huff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Huff v. State

206 So. 3d 167, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18319

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 2016·No. Case No. 2D15-1630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM,

We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Huffs motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal [168]*168Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huffs right to file a legally sufficient motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM,

We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Huffs motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal [168]*168Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huffs right to file a legally sufficient motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Huff v. State, 206 So. 3d 167, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18319 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

206 So. 3d 167 (Huff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.